Performance evaluation and specifying of Return to scale in network DEA

Document Type : Original Paper


1 Department of Mathematics, Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

2 Department of Mathematics, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University Tehran, Iran

3 Department of Industrial Management, Economic and Management Faculty, Shiraz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shiraz, Iran


Although Data envelopment analysis is a powerful technique for evaluation of decision making units with multiple inputs and outputs, internal activities are neglected and each unit treats as "black box" by considering only initial input and output in the basic DEA models. However, in this paper, a network DEA model for multi stages units was designed as a tool for considering the importance of internal relations. At first a new production possibility set was defined for two-stage units and introduced a new method for evaluation of two-stage units. Since, one of the most important issues in economical decision makings is RTS, a new algorithm for specify the RTS in two-stage units was presented by using of the new PPS, and then the proposed algorithm on empirical study was applied and the final results were analyzed.


Main Subjects

1. Kao, C. and Hwang, S.N. (2008). Efficiency decomposition in two-stage
data envelopment analysis: An application to non-life insurance
companies in Taiwan, European Journal of Operational Research, 185,
2. Chen, Y. and Cook, W.D. and Li, N. and Zhu, J. (2009). Additive
efficiency decomposition in two-stage DEA, European Journal of
Operational Research, 196, 1170–1176.
3.Cook, W. and Zhu, J. and Bi, G. and Yang, F. (2010). Network DEA:
Additive efficiency decomposition, European Journal of Operational
Research, 207, 1122-1129.
4.Tone, K. and Tsutsui, M. (2009). Network DEA: A slack-based measure
approach, European Journal of Operational Research, 197, 243-252.
[10] Yang, F. and Wu, D. and Liang, L. and Bi, G. and Wu, D. D. (2011).
Supply chain DEA: production possibility set and performance evaluation
model. Annals of operations research, 185, 195-211.